| The Balcony | ||
| Number: | 202 | |
| Date: | 1879/1880 | |
| Medium: | etching and drypoint | |
| Size: | 298 x 203 mm | |
| Signed: | butterfly at upper left | |
| Inscribed: | no | |
| Set/Publication: | 'Second Venice Set', 1886 | |
| No. of States: | 19 | |
| Known impressions: | 56 | |
| Catalogues: | K.207; M.204; W.177 | |
| Impressions taken from this plate (56) | ||
TECHNIQUE
As with a number of other Venetian subjects, Whistler began The Balcony in etching, with the main elements of the composition fully expressed. He then employed both etching and drypoint to refine small areas of the plate, most notably the figures and shading within the window openings above the balcony and the two figures outside and just within the open doorway.  While several alterations were made to the window area - and to the man standing in the boat in front of the doorway - the figure within the doorway was reworked over and over again. The standing woman not only shifted from side to side in the opening, but her costume, hair and  pose also changed many times.
Foul biting that appeared during the development of the plate is evidence that, for certain changes, Whistler applied acid directly to  small areas of the plate without covering the copper with an etching ground.  Spots and granular patches on the image represent droplets and larger pools of acid  that came in contact with the plate during the reworking process.
PRINTING
There are many different states  of The Balcony and  numerous working proofs of these states.  One such 'trial proof' - the second state - was printed in black ink on ivory laid watermarked paper and drawn on in black ink, amending the figures of the gondolier and the woman in the doorway ( ). Whistler kept several of these proofs, including one each of the seventh (
). Whistler kept several of these proofs, including one each of the seventh ( ), tenth (
), tenth ( ) and eleventh state (
) and eleventh state ( ). A couple of late impressions were actually cut up, preserving only the central area of the doorway (
). A couple of late impressions were actually cut up, preserving only the central area of the doorway ( ,
,  ).
).
 ). Whistler kept several of these proofs, including one each of the seventh (
). Whistler kept several of these proofs, including one each of the seventh ( ), tenth (
), tenth ( ) and eleventh state (
) and eleventh state ( ). A couple of late impressions were actually cut up, preserving only the central area of the doorway (
). A couple of late impressions were actually cut up, preserving only the central area of the doorway ( ,
,  ).
). Whistler started printing The Balcony for Messrs Dowdeswell and Thibaudeau in March 1886. He delivered in all 1093 prints for the complete 'Second Venice Set'.	 11    The printing of The Balcony is well documented. Whistler would print on average only one or two  impressions a day, since he was also printing impressions from the other plates. Some of the records are undated; for instance on separate occasions five, two, and  again five impressions were recorded as delivered, but some records are  duplicated, and these may be recorded elsewhere. 12 
Documents record one impression delivered on 2 April 1886, five on 28 July 1886 and one on 20 August 1886. 13
These records do not exactly correspond to the most complete record of impressions received by Dowdeswell's, which list five delivered on 22 July 1886 and two on 20 August; one on 2 April (it is not quite clear if this is 1886 or 1887); six on 28 June, two on 2 July, twelve on 7 July and twenty-five on 16 July 1887, a total of 53. 14
The edition was completed and the cancelled copper plate and an impression from it were delivered with the final 25 impressions on 16 July 1887. 15 The whole edition of the 'Second Venice Set' was completed by July, the last plates being The Balcony and The Garden [194].
Documents record one impression delivered on 2 April 1886, five on 28 July 1886 and one on 20 August 1886. 13
These records do not exactly correspond to the most complete record of impressions received by Dowdeswell's, which list five delivered on 22 July 1886 and two on 20 August; one on 2 April (it is not quite clear if this is 1886 or 1887); six on 28 June, two on 2 July, twelve on 7 July and twenty-five on 16 July 1887, a total of 53. 14
The edition was completed and the cancelled copper plate and an impression from it were delivered with the final 25 impressions on 16 July 1887. 15 The whole edition of the 'Second Venice Set' was completed by July, the last plates being The Balcony and The Garden [194].
11: Dowdeswell to Whistler, 16 July 1887, GUW #00891.
12: W. Dowdeswell to Whistler, [March/April 1886], GUW #08680; [March/Oct. 1886], #08684; Whistler to Dowdeswell, [March/Dec. 1886], #08681.
13: Dowdeswell to Whistler, GUW #00863, #00869, #00872.
14: Whistler to W. Dowdeswell, GUW #08717.
15: Whistler to Dowdeswell, GUW #13653.
Early impressions were printed in black ink on  ivory  ( ) and buff  (
) and buff  ( , (
, ( ) laid papers. The fifth state  was usually printed in dark brown ink on ivory laid paper (
) laid papers. The fifth state  was usually printed in dark brown ink on ivory laid paper ( ,
,  ,
,  ), one with a  Hunting horn in shield watermark (
), one with a  Hunting horn in shield watermark ( ).  The sixth  state was in black ink on light-weight buff laid (
).  The sixth  state was in black ink on light-weight buff laid ( ) and 'antique' (pre-1800) laid (
) and 'antique' (pre-1800) laid ( ). Seventh states were both in black on ivory laid (
). Seventh states were both in black on ivory laid ( ) and in brown ink on 'antique' laid (
) and in brown ink on 'antique' laid ( ).
).
 ) and buff  (
) and buff  ( , (
, ( ) laid papers. The fifth state  was usually printed in dark brown ink on ivory laid paper (
) laid papers. The fifth state  was usually printed in dark brown ink on ivory laid paper ( ,
,  ,
,  ), one with a  Hunting horn in shield watermark (
), one with a  Hunting horn in shield watermark ( ).  The sixth  state was in black ink on light-weight buff laid (
).  The sixth  state was in black ink on light-weight buff laid ( ) and 'antique' (pre-1800) laid (
) and 'antique' (pre-1800) laid ( ). Seventh states were both in black on ivory laid (
). Seventh states were both in black on ivory laid ( ) and in brown ink on 'antique' laid (
) and in brown ink on 'antique' laid ( ).
).Some of the fifth and sixth state impressions are neither trimmed nor signed by Whistler ( ,
,  ,
,  ) including one that may have been acquired by  the young Thomas Robert Way (1861-1913) when  Whistler  was deciding on the composition of the 'First Venice Set' for the F.A.S. (
) including one that may have been acquired by  the young Thomas Robert Way (1861-1913) when  Whistler  was deciding on the composition of the 'First Venice Set' for the F.A.S. ( ). Way described his early experience of assisting Whistler:
). Way described his early experience of assisting Whistler:
 ,
,  ,
,  ) including one that may have been acquired by  the young Thomas Robert Way (1861-1913) when  Whistler  was deciding on the composition of the 'First Venice Set' for the F.A.S. (
) including one that may have been acquired by  the young Thomas Robert Way (1861-1913) when  Whistler  was deciding on the composition of the 'First Venice Set' for the F.A.S. ( ). Way described his early experience of assisting Whistler:
). Way described his early experience of assisting Whistler:'Shortly afterwards he started on the proving
of the set of plates for the Fine Art Society, who
had taken a first-floor suite of two rooms for him
at the north-west corner of Air Street and Regent
Street, in the Quadrant over a stationer's shop.
... I was working in the schools at South Kensington
then, but as Whistler wanted to have some one
with him, I had that privilege during the whole
of this historic time, fetching and carrying, and
preparing his materials, and generally making myself
useful. Among other things, I had to see
to the proper damping of the old Dutch paper,
and its careful brushing to remove any loose hairs
or other matters before it was used for printing
on, and to press the proofs very carefully and
thoroughly, that they might be quite flat before
being seen. He had not then taken to his later
custom of cutting off the margins of the paper
beyond the subject.' 16 
16: Way 1912, pp. 41-42.
Most impressions were trimmed to the platemark and signed on the tab with a butterfly and 'imp.' to show that Whistler had printed them.  Early impressions sometimes bear an 1880 or 1881 butterfly ( ,
,  ).  Other impressions were both trimmed and signed a few years later, probably  in 1886, when it was decided that The Balcony should be included in the Twenty-six Etchings (the 'Second Venice Set') (
).  Other impressions were both trimmed and signed a few years later, probably  in 1886, when it was decided that The Balcony should be included in the Twenty-six Etchings (the 'Second Venice Set') ( ). Some seem to have been signed very carelessly by Whistler or perhaps by someone else (
). Some seem to have been signed very carelessly by Whistler or perhaps by someone else ( ,
,  ).
).
 ,
,  ).  Other impressions were both trimmed and signed a few years later, probably  in 1886, when it was decided that The Balcony should be included in the Twenty-six Etchings (the 'Second Venice Set') (
).  Other impressions were both trimmed and signed a few years later, probably  in 1886, when it was decided that The Balcony should be included in the Twenty-six Etchings (the 'Second Venice Set') ( ). Some seem to have been signed very carelessly by Whistler or perhaps by someone else (
). Some seem to have been signed very carelessly by Whistler or perhaps by someone else ( ,
,  ).
).It is not certain but it was probably from the eighth state on that impressions were being delivered to Messrs Dowdeswell & Thibaudeau for publication in  the Twenty-six Etchings  in 1886.
Many of the later impressions were printed both in  dark brown and black ink. Impressions in brown ink included ones on ivory laid paper ( ,
,  ,
,  ); ivory laid with horned crown watermark  (
); ivory laid with horned crown watermark  ( ) and  'antique' laid with an 'SH' countermark  (
) and  'antique' laid with an 'SH' countermark  ( ). In addition, many  impressions of the later states were printed in black ink on a variety of papers including ivory Asian laid (
). In addition, many  impressions of the later states were printed in black ink on a variety of papers including ivory Asian laid ( ); ivory laid (
); ivory laid ( ,
,  ,
,  ,
,   ); ivory laid, possibly with 'IV' countermark (
); ivory laid, possibly with 'IV' countermark ( ); cream laid with Strasbourg Lily 'LVG' watermark (
); cream laid with Strasbourg Lily 'LVG' watermark ( );  and cream medium-weight  laid paper (
);  and cream medium-weight  laid paper ( ,
,  ). Many of these later impressions would have been among those delivered in July 1887.
). Many of these later impressions would have been among those delivered in July 1887.
 ,
,  ,
,  ); ivory laid with horned crown watermark  (
); ivory laid with horned crown watermark  ( ) and  'antique' laid with an 'SH' countermark  (
) and  'antique' laid with an 'SH' countermark  ( ). In addition, many  impressions of the later states were printed in black ink on a variety of papers including ivory Asian laid (
). In addition, many  impressions of the later states were printed in black ink on a variety of papers including ivory Asian laid ( ); ivory laid (
); ivory laid ( ,
,  ,
,  ,
,   ); ivory laid, possibly with 'IV' countermark (
); ivory laid, possibly with 'IV' countermark ( ); cream laid with Strasbourg Lily 'LVG' watermark (
); cream laid with Strasbourg Lily 'LVG' watermark ( );  and cream medium-weight  laid paper (
);  and cream medium-weight  laid paper ( ,
,  ). Many of these later impressions would have been among those delivered in July 1887.
). Many of these later impressions would have been among those delivered in July 1887.

